Picture by Daniel Thornberg
The U.S. Home of Representatives voted 214-208 on Wednesday, January 21, to permit mining close to the Boundary Waters Canoe Space Wilderness in Minnesota, setting the stage for a possible copper mining challenge within the Superior Nationwide Forest watershed.
The decision, launched by Rep. Pete Stauber (R-Minnesota), would rescind a public land order from the Biden administration that protected roughly 225,500 acres of the Superior Nationwide Forest for 20 years. The measure now heads to the Republican-controlled Senate, although the timing for a vote stays unclear.
What’s at Stake
The Boundary Waters Canoe Space Wilderness includes over 1,000 lakes in northern Minnesota and is widely regarded as a world-class destination for walleye, lake trout, smallmouth bass, and northern pike fishing. It’s the most visited wilderness space within the nation, attracting roughly 250,000 guests yearly.
Conservation teams warn that the proposed Twin Metals mine—owned by Chilean firm Antofagasta—would introduce sulfide-ore copper mining to the area for the primary time. Not like conventional iron mining, sulfide mining produces sulfuric acid, which might contaminate lakes and rivers for hundreds of years. The area’s interconnected waterways imply air pollution may unfold throughout hundreds of thousands of acres, doubtlessly reaching Lake Superior.
“This might pave the best way for sulfide-ore copper mining within the area—probably the most poisonous trade in America—which has by no means been allowed in Minnesota earlier than,” mentioned Rep. Kelly Morrison (D-MN), calling the decision “the best menace to the Boundary Waters in historical past.”
Broader Implications for Public Lands
The decision makes use of the Congressional Evaluate Act (CRA) to overturn a mineral withdrawal—an unprecedented application of the law that conservation teams say may set a harmful precedent for public lands nationwide.
“In the present day, those that voted in favor of HJR 140 voted to promote out American public lands to international pursuits,” mentioned Ingrid Lyons, Executive Director of Save the Boundary Waters. “This invoice sacrifices America’s most visited Wilderness for the good thing about a Chilean firm that sends its concentrates to China.”
In accordance with Save the Boundary Waters, if the decision is signed into legislation, it “would imply that no established land administration choice could be protected from politicized assault and nullification.”
Sportsmen React
The decision has drawn opposition from looking and fishing teams who worth the wilderness for its leisure alternatives.
“The looking, fishing, angling and outside neighborhood desires to see this place protected, plain and easy,” mentioned Matthew Schultz, spokesperson for Sportsmen for the Boundary Waters. “Regardless of who you voted for, no one voted for much less public lands and fewer entry to them. With out a shadow of a doubt, ought to this cross by way of the Senate, that’s what will occur.”
Lukas Leaf, govt director of Sportsmen for the Boundary Waters, famous the cultural significance of the world: “My dad and I used to name it ‘going to church.’ Lots of people resonate with that relating to the Boundary Waters.”
What Occurs Subsequent
The decision now strikes to the Senate, the place Republicans maintain 53 of the chamber’s 100 seats. The Senate Parliamentarian must first rule on whether or not the CRA can legally be used to problem mineral withdrawals. If the decision passes each chambers and is signed by President Trump, the 20-year mining ban could be overturned, paving the best way for the administration to concern mineral leases within the Boundary Waters watershed.
Conservation teams are urging residents to contact their U.S. Senators to oppose the measure.
Trending Merchandise
